Get e-book Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens book. Happy reading Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Live Aware, Not in Fear: The 411 After 9-11, A Book for Teens Pocket Guide.

Former Library book. Better World. Shows some signs of wear, and may ". Complete and clean. Good reading copy. Minor shelf wear, great buy! Book Depository. Over the years a conflict over Kashmiri identity and independence has slowly but visibly mutated into an even more dangerous fight under the banner of religion, pitting Islam against Hinduism, and drawing religious radicals into its heart.

Indian security forces claim they are fighting to protect Kashmiris from militants and Islamist extremists, while militants claim they are fighting for Kashmiri independence and to defend Muslim Kashmiris from a murderous Indian Army. In reality, both sides have committed widespread and numerous human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law the laws of war , creating among the civilian population a pervasive climate of fear, distrust, and sadness. In this report we document serious abuses, especially the targeting of civilians, by both government forces and militants in Jammu and Kashmir.

Those abuses continue, despite a tentative peace process that includes talks between New Delhi, Islamabad, and some of Kashmir's separatist leaders, modest confidence-building measures between India and Pakistan, and the election of a state government with an avowed agenda to improve the human rights situation. Particular attention is given in this report to the problem of impunity from prosecution, whereby those responsible for abuses rarely get investigated, let alone tried and convicted.

Indian army and paramilitary forces have been responsible for innumerable and serious violations of human rights in Kashmir. Extrajudicial executions are widespread. Police and army officials have told Human Rights Watch that alleged militants taken into custody are often executed instead of being brought to trial because they believe that keeping hardcore militants in jail is a security risk. Most of those summarily executed are falsely reported to have died during armed clashes between the army and militants in what are euphemistically called "encounter killings.

Forensic tests ordered by the state government later showed them to be local villagers who were innocent of the Sikh massacre. In many other cases Indian security forces have shot civilians under the authority of laws such as the Jammu and Kashmir Disturbed Areas Act and the Armed Forces Jammu and Kashmir Special Powers Act, which allow lethal force to be used "against any person who is acting in contravention of any law or order for the time being in force in the disturbed area.

Even the army has admitted that the extraordinary powers to shoot have led to "mistakes. Such mistakes, which are not uncommon, greatly inflame public passions in Jammu and Kashmir. Indian security forces have long been responsible for enforced disappearances-that is, they deny having custody of an individual, typically in conjunction with their torture or extrajudicial execution. Kashmiri human rights defenders say that at least eight thousand people have "disappeared" since the conflict began; most were last seen in the custody of troops. While the state government has admitted that nearly four thousand people are "missing" in Jammu and Kashmir, it claims that many of them actually crossed into Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir to join the militants.

While the number of new "disappearances" appears to have decreased in the past few years from the huge numbers that characterized the early years of the conflict, that they continue at all is shameful for the world's largest democracy. Moreover, there is still no information about the fate of thousands of individuals "disappeared" by Indian security forces since the beginning of the insurgency.

Interviews conducted by Human Rights Watch show that torture of detainees, in particular severe beatings during interrogations of suspected militants and their supporters, remains the norm. Kashmiris also complain of a form of punishment in which individuals are picked up for questioning and tortured in order to obtain information about a family member believed to be a militant.

Militants who have surrendered said that they are treated with suspicion and often brutally interrogated. One former militant told Human Rights Watch that when he "disappeared" for over a month in he had actually been in army custody, where he was blindfolded, tied up, and beaten while his interrogators asked him for information about his former comrades. Despite claims of a new campaign by the army to train members of the security forces in public relations, army, paramilitary and police behavior towards the public is usually aggressive, distrusting, and rude.

Kashmiris are often arbitrarily and illegally detained. The Additional Advocate General told the Srinagar High Court recently that there were 4, suspected militants in jail, awaiting trial. Many of them, say human rights lawyers, have been in custody for ten or more years and some have never been produced in court.

Without evidence to secure a conviction or to prevent them from being released on bail, they are often held under a draconian preventive detention law called the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act PSA. The PSA allows for detention without trial for up to two years to prevent an individual from "acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state or the maintenance of public order. As part of the current state government's "healing touch policy" and the ongoing peace talks between New Delhi and some of the separatist groups, dozens of alleged militants, including some who served more than two years under the PSA, have been released.

The state government claims that of the nearly 1, held in detention when it came to power in November , three years later only alleged militants remain in custody under the PSA, including nearly two hundred foreigners, most of them Pakistani. Human rights defenders insist the number of those in custody is larger, but since no central record is maintained, it is impossible to independently verify the claims.

Sept. 11 Survivor Recalls Stairway to Safety

One indication of the current scope of the problem is that habeas corpus "produce the body" petitions were filed to challenge detentions in Kashmiris have also been subjected to human rights abuses and humanitarian law violations by secessionist armed groups, commonly referred to as militants. Often intentionally ignored by supporters of Kashmiri independence or its accession to Pakistan are the numerous massacres, bombings, killings, and attacks on schools attributed to the militants.

Throughout the conflict, militant groups have targeted civilians, including women and children, whom they consider to be "traitors to the cause" or for expressing views contrary to those of one or another armed group. Alleged militants have murdered nearly six hundred Kashmiri politicians since the conflict began, usually as retribution for joining in the electoral process. Officials conducting the polls have been killed or tortured, some with their noses or ears chopped off.

Militants have violently assaulted Kashmiris, including women, by chopping off ears or noses, as a means of punishing their relatives whom they consider to be traitors-informers, security personnel, or surrendered militants. In several cases children have been abducted or executed. Militants have been implicated in bomb attacks even outside Jammu and Kashmir.

Table of contents

After a series of bomb blasts in India's capital New Delhi on October 29, , which killed over fifty civilians, a little-known group called Islami Inqilabi Mahaz claimed responsibility. In March , a series of bomb blasts in Varanasi killed twenty people. Once again, an unknown group called Lashkar-e-Qahar called journalists in Jammu and Kashmir to claim responsibility and threaten more attacks. The July serial blasts in Bombay's commuter trains that killed nearly two hundred have also been attributed to militants sympathetic to the Kashmiri struggle for secession, though as of this writing no evidence has been produced.

Militant groups have attacked religious minorities in Kashmir such as Hindus and Sikhs, as well as ethnic minorities such as the Gujjars and Bakarwals whom the militants target because they believe them to be government informers. Militants have committed at least twenty massacres of civilians from minority groups, usually in the middle of the night when they were asleep.


  • Cookies on the BBC website.
  • Depression in Children and Adolescents?
  • Chamomile: Industrial Profiles (Medicinal and Aromatic Plants - Industrial Profiles).
  • New & Used Books, Cheap Books Online | Half Price Books.
  • Gender in Early Childhood.
  • Site Information Navigation.
  • Pure - Research Information Repository - Edge Hill University;

Even as Kashmiris were climbing out of the rubble and mourning their dead after the October 8, earthquake, militants decapitated ten Hindus in Rajouri district. In May , thirty-five Hindus were killed in the remote hamlets of Doda and Udhampur districts; police blamed the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba. In recent years, as the conflict has increasingly taken on religious overtones, many militant groups have also begun to impose a more fundamentalist version of Islam in predominantly Sufi Kashmir.

Some women have been punished for not adopting Islamic dress codes as demanded by some militant groups, while cable television operators and Internet centers have been targeted for promoting "immorality. Although many of the militant groups currently operating in Jammu and Kashmir have become increasingly unpopular, Kashmiris are afraid to speak out against them. There is considerable evidence that over many years Pakistan has provided Kashmiri militants with training, weapons, funding, and sanctuary. Officially, Pakistan denies ever arming and training militants.

However, real decision-making authority and management of the "Kashmir struggle" has long rested firmly with the Pakistani military and its Inter Services Intelligence ISI agency and the militant organizations it has supported and mentored. Under pressure from Washington after the September 11, attacks on the United States, Pakistan banned several militant groups in January , including the Jaish-e-Mohammad and the Lashkar-e-Toiba, although they have continued to operate after changing their names.

India blames these groups for many armed attacks. Yet Pakistan appears to be keeping its options open should peace talks collapse. Former militants told Human Rights Watch that Pakistan's army and intelligence services, in particular the ISI, continue to support armed groups operating in Jammu and Kashmir. In July , as the snow melted and mountain passes opened, the Indian armed forces claimed to have killed at least forty armed militants in just one week as they attempted to cross into Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

Recent reports in the Pakistani media have also stated that many training camps are still functioning. After the earthquake, several armed groups conducted significant emergency relief operations in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, handing out weatherized tents even before the Pakistani government could mobilize. Under international humanitarian law the laws of war , the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir is considered to be a non-international internal armed conflict.

Applicable law, to which both state armed forces and opposition armed groups must abide, includes Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and customary international humanitarian law. This law prohibits attacks against civilians and civilian objects, and requires that civilians and captured combatants be treated humanely at all times. Serious violations of the laws of war are war crimes, which states have a duty to prosecute.

Indian security forces are also bound by international human rights law, such as is found in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which India ratified in Human rights law prohibits extrajudicial executions, torture and other mistreatment, enforced disappearances and arbitrary arrest and detention. States have a duty under international law to investigate and prosecute serious violations of human rights. Throughout the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir, impunity from prosecution for serious crimes has been a common thread.

Impunity occurs when the state consistently fails in its responsibility-because of a lack of capability or political will or laws shielding state abusers-to hold perpetrators of human rights violations accountable. This creates an atmosphere in which violators believe that they can get away with the most serious crimes. As stated by the United Nations U. General Assembly in its March resolution on the right of victims of human rights abuses to a remedy, states must "[i]nvestigate violations effectively, promptly, thoroughly and impartially and, where appropriate, take action against those allegedly responsible in accordance with domestic and international law.

Although India has internal systems of inquiry and punishment, Human Rights Watch-despite several letters requesting the information from the Indian government-has received no details of any cases in which members of the Indian security forces have been prosecuted and convicted for serious human rights violations. In March , Chief Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad said that army personnel, seventy-nine members of the Border Security Force, and sixty policemen have been punished for committing human rights abuses since the insurgency first began. However, as no details of these incidents are available and the chief minister claimed at the same time that there were only complaints of human rights violations since , these figures cannot be taken at face value, and the commitment to transparently investigate, prosecute and punish individuals responsible for abuses remains in doubt.

Instead, soldiers, paramilitaries, and police are routinely shielded by both their uniformed and civilian superiors in Jammu and Kashmir and New Delhi and by laws that make it extremely difficult to prosecute members of the armed forces in civilian courts. Indian and Kashmiri policemen watch as shooting breaks out following an attack by suspected Pakistani Islamist militants in the center of Srinagar's business district, July 29, Indian law offers a remarkable amount of legal protection to members of the armed forces and civilian officials implicated in criminal offenses.

Section 45 of the Criminal Procedure Code of protects any member of the armed forces from arrest for "anything done or purported to be done [emphasis added] by him in the discharge of his official duties except after obtaining the consent of the Central government. It makes it mandatory for a prosecutor to obtain permission from the federal government to initiate criminal proceedings against public servants, including armed forces personnel. Military personnel are also subject to the Manual of Military Law and Regulations, which details the rules and procedures for the investigation, prosecution, and punishment of military offenses and crimes in the armed forces.

There is little evidence that the military has shown any greater interest in prosecuting its own for human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir than has the civilian justice system. This impunity has an impact that spreads well beyond the original crime, encouraging other abuses. For instance, a Kashmiri man whose son was "disappeared" told Human Rights Watch that police warned him that if he failed to pay a bribe or complained to the authorities, not only would the son be killed, but he himself would be taken into the jungle, killed, and identified as a "foreign militant.

In this report we trace impunity for the most serious abuses dating back to the beginning of the conflict. We describe how in the Central Reserve Police Force shot and killed at least thirty-five Kashmiri demonstrators according to some reports, as many as one hundred as they reached the Gawakadal Bridge on Srinagar's Jhelum River.

A similar number of demonstrators protesting the killing of religious leader Mirwaiz Maulvi Mohammad Farooq were gunned down by security forces on May 21, In October at least thirty-seven people were killed when personnel from the 74th Battalion Border Security Force opened fire to disperse more than ten thousand people demonstrating in Beijbehara against an earlier incident of indiscriminate firing in Srinagar.

And then there is the case of the murder of human rights lawyer Jalil Andrabi in by the army. No one has been arrested let alone prosecuted in such cases, which have seared the consciences of many Kashmiris and taken on almost legendary status as proof that the Indian state is fighting a war not to protect Kashmiris, but to subjugate them. Impunity continues to the present. In May , Javed Ahmad Magray, a seventeen-year-old student, was murdered one night near his home in Srinagar. An investigation by the district administration concluded that Magray had been abducted and killed by the army.

Although the investigation identified the officer responsible, he was never arrested or even compelled to testify during the inquiry, because the army claimed that his unit had been moved out of Jammu and Kashmir. This is where the immunity provisions in the law kicked in-under the Armed Forces Jammu and Kashmir Special Powers Act, the state government must seek permission from the central government to prosecute members of the armed forces.

As is almost always the case, as of May that permission had not been granted. Despite several requests to the army for information, there is no evidence that the Indian army has sought to prosecute the officer under the military justice code. Pakistan has never held any militant accountable for crimes committed in Jammu and Kashmir. Instead, many militants enjoy the sanctuary of Pakistani soil after they commit abuses across the border.

Leaders of militant groups have never made any public statements renouncing their policy of attacks upon civilians, or given any indication that those responsible for such abuses should be held to account. Impunity not only affects the victims and their families. In Jammu and Kashmir, impunity has bred cynicism and distrust of authority.

It has led to divisions in society that will take a long time to heal. Many Kashmiris told us that impunity for human rights violations is the single biggest obstacle to a restoration of normality in the state. They made it plain that no peace or ceasefire will be meaningful or enduring without an end to the almost complete impunity that the Indian security forces and the militants have enjoyed.

The Impact of 9/11 on Psychology and Education

Many in Jammu and Kashmir believe that if the Indian government had taken action against abuses, ordered immediate investigations, and transparently prosecuted and punished those found responsible, many lives might ultimately have been spared. Public willingness to overlook brutal crimes by the militants might have been much lower. Instead, government abuses have acted as a recruiting sergeant for the militants and, throughout the conflict, provided a platform to garner support for the insurgency. When the armed rebellion first began in , most Kashmiris believed it would be a short struggle.

As militants started a campaign of bombings, grenade attacks, and killings of civilian officials, almost every day there were demonstrations. Kashmiris were out in the streets in the tens of thousands, calling for " azaadi ," or independence. Local government came to a halt and, taken aback by the scale of the protests, it scrambled futilely to restore order, deploying nervous, ill-trained troops who used unnecessary lethal force, killing scores of unarmed demonstrators. It has even almost led to war between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan. After a deadly attack on India's parliament in December that left twelve people, including the five gunmen, dead, India blamed Pakistan-based militant groups operating in Jammu and Kashmir.

All five gunmen, according to the police, were Pakistani. After the attack, the two countries deployed over a million troops to the border. There was frightening talk of a nuclear war until, under international pressure, the troops were pulled back. It has been sustained by international pressure driven by the post-September 11, "war on terror" and fear of nuclear war between countries that have gone to war three times since independence in , plus a certain amount of "Kashmir fatigue" on both sides of the border, and the desperate yearning of most Kashmiris for an end to the conflict.

Elections in India in brought a coalition led by the Congress party to power in New Delhi and the two governments have continued to meet, albeit at a languid pace and with a modest agenda. While both Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and General Musharraf say they are committed to the peace process, progress has been slow. Although the two governments may not have found an immediate solution to Kashmir, they are encouraging people-to-people contact by easing visa regulations and providing cheap bus and train services across the border.

However, because of a history of distrust, the process is still tenuous and all sides can point to abuses by the other as a reason to continue the fight. However, more and more voices are beginning to point to the same atrocities as a reason to stop. Many observers believe that there is an unprecedented opportunity to reach a final settlement that addresses Kashmir's critical human rights situation.

The United States, the world's sole superpower and a proponent of a settlement, is for the first time considered a friend of both India and Pakistan. In Jammu and Kashmir, a coalition government between the People's Democratic Party PDP and the Congress party is in power after defeating a discredited state administration in elections.

The coalition had made human rights one of its main campaign planks. Though it has little power over the national security services, the state government has repeatedly called for an end to chronic problems such as "disappearances" and custodial killings. Perhaps most important, there has been a significant change in both the Indian and Pakistani governments' attitudes, with senior Indian officials admitting human rights violations as opposed to earlier flat denials and some Pakistani officials admitting their role in influencing and supporting the militants.


  • Patterns of Impunity in Jammu and Kashmir | HRW!
  • Maritime Piracy and its Control: An Economic Analysis?
  • The China Study Quick & Easy Cookbook: Cook Once, Eat All Week with Whole Food, Plant-Based Recipes!
  • Navigation menu.
  • Log in to Wiley Online Library.
  • The Day that Changed Everything?!

Kashmiri rebel political leaders also admit that armed groups have committed human rights abuses. That, too, is a significant shift from the early years of the conflict. Although the process is inordinately slow, India has also begun to talk to Kashmiri rebel political leaders, though it is yet to initiate talks with the Pakistan-based militant leaders. New Delhi is demanding a convincing end to Pakistani support to the militants.

There have been some proposals towards a possible solution, including the demilitarization of Kashmir and eventual self-rule for Kashmiris, who are presently separated by the Line of Control that divides Indian- and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Most analysts believe this to be premature because neither country will want to relinquish its military presence in the areas under their control. India also says that with militants still attacking civilians, it cannot risk withdrawing troops. Pakistan and the rebel groups say that if India only agreed to work honestly towards an honorable settlement, there would be no need for an armed struggle and militancy would end.

Perhaps the greatest impetus for a settlement is weariness on all sides with a conflict that has brought so much misery but no victory for either the Indian army or the militants. Nor has it resolved Kashmir's future as part of India, Pakistan, or as an independent entity. It is noteworthy that many Kashmiris in favor of independence have come to this view not just as a political statement, but because of the constant abuse that they have witnessed and suffered.

Many ordinary Kashmiris are beginning to say that they are paying too heavy a price in this conflict and that it is the militants, and not just the Indian security forces, that are to be blamed. According to the Mumbai-based InternationalCenter for Peace Initiatives, nearly 85 percent of those killed in militant attacks since the conflict started have been Kashmiri Muslims.

Many Kashmiris told Human Rights Watch that they have a desperate hope for peace and, feeling let down by those claiming to represent them, including mainstream politicians, Kashmiri nationalists and militant leaders, seek new leadership. They believe that without authentic local leadership, they will not be adequately represented in negotiations.

But they are concerned that independent Kashmiri voices with priorities inconsistent with established militant agendas will be branded as "traitors" and targeted for attack. Abdul Ghani Lone was one of the first moderate leaders of the All Party Hurriyat Conference to become a vocal advocate of dialogue and compromise. He was killed on May 21, His son Sajjad Lone believes that Pakistan-backed militant groups murdered his father because he advocated a settlement with India.

Sajjad Lone described what he said had become the greatest tragedy in the Kashmir conflict, that Kashmiris were being killed by their professed liberators:. Just as human rights abuses and impunity have been a cause and fuel for the conflict, human rights protections and accountability can be key ingredients for a solution. There can be no better confidence building measure than an end to abuses on both sides and the beginnings of an effort to address the crimes of both the past and present.

With strong and committed political leadership in India, Pakistan, and Jammu and Kashmir, and pressure and support from the United States and other key international actors, substantial progress can be made in a short period of time. Then "all this violence" may begin to become part of Kashmir's past, instead of its future. The government of India, the government of Pakistan, and all militant and Kashmiri groups should place human rights protection mechanisms at the center of any attempt to resolve the conflict and ensure responsibility for abuses by ending impunity, without which a sustainable settlement is impossible.

India and the state government of Jammu and Kashmir should each establish an independent and impartial commission of inquiry into serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law by Indian security forces since the beginning of the conflict. India is a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council and thus bound to cooperate with its mechanisms. The Indian government should issue a standing invitation to the relevant United Nations thematic human rights rapporteurs or working groups to come to Jammu and Kashmir to investigate the human rights situation.

The United Nations Human Rights Council should appoint a special rapporteur with an ongoing mandate to publish regular and public reports on the human rights situation in Jammu and Kashmir and Azad Kashmir. The governments of India and Pakistan should publicly commit to full cooperation with the special rapporteur, including with any necessary visits. Given the continuing failure of the military justice system to prosecute members of the armed forces for human rights abuses, members of the army and other security forces of all ranks implicated in serious rights abuses should be fully and fairly prosecuted in civilian courts.

The Indian parliament should amend the Human Rights Protection Act to allow the National Human Rights Commission to independently investigate allegations of abuse by members of the armed forces. The Indian government should publicly release detailed information on all arrests, prosecutions, and convictions of army troops, paramilitaries, police, and public officials for human rights violations since the beginning of the conflict.

IN ADDITION TO READING ONLINE, THIS TITLE IS AVAILABLE IN THESE FORMATS:

It should release the same information on an annual basis in the future. Militant groups should take all necessary steps to abide by international humanitarian law, including: ending direct or indiscriminate attacks on civilians; the summary execution, torture or other ill-treatment of persons in custody; attacks on schools; and the recruitment of children into their forces.


  • The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House (Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics).
  • Post navigation.
  • Diagnostic Atlas of Common Eyelid Diseases Informa Healthcare!
  • The Art of Cosmic Vision: Practices for Improving Your Eyesight;

Militants groups should publicly condemn abuses by any militant group and ensure that there is accountability for such abuses. Pakistan should stop providing arms, finance, sanctuary, and training to militant groups that have failed or are unwilling to abide by international humanitarian law. Otherwise Pakistan will be held complicit in abuses by such groups. The international community should urge the governments of India and Pakistan and all militant and Kashmiri groups to place human rights protection mechanisms at the center of any attempt to resolve the conflict.

No sustainable settlement will be possible without an end to abuses and impunity. Research in Jammu and Kashmir was conducted from to February and in Azad Kashmir in and Additional research was conducted by telephone, email and in meetings with nongovernmental organizations NGOs and officials in New Delhi, Islamabad and elsewhere. Human Rights Watch interviewed government officials, army officers, police officials, politicians, journalists, human rights defenders, members of the international and diplomatic community, militants, and victims of human rights violations.

Information here about unresolved or ongoing cases is at least as reported at the time of Human Rights Watch's most recent research in Jammu and Kashmir, in February Wherever possible, efforts have been made to provide more up-to-date information in such cases. Despite several letters requesting the information from the Indian government, at the time of writing Human Rights Watch had received no details of any cases in which members of the Indian security forces have been prosecuted and convicted for serious human rights violations. In order to protect victims and others who might face reprisals by either side for speaking against them, names and any information that might identify them, such as places where interviews were held or specific dates of those meetings, have been withheld in certain cases.

The state comprises the administrative regions of Jammu, which lies in the plains below the Pir Panjal range, and has a population of approximately 4.

This guy thinks SPEAK is pornography – Laurie Halse Anderson

Jammu and Kashmir is the only Muslim majority state in India. However, the state is divided roughly along religious lines. Ninety-five percent of the residents of the Kashmir valley are Muslim, the overwhelming majority of whom are Sunni, while 50 percent of the population of Ladakh is Buddhist and 46 percent is Muslim most of the Muslims of Ladakh are Shia.

Jammu has a very different religious make-up, with 66 percent of the population Hindu and most of the rest Muslim. Before the conflict, Jammu and Kashmir had a large and profitable tourist industry, which provided a major portion of the state revenue. But tourist numbers have dropped from more than seven hundred thousand visitors a year before to fewer than eight thousand per year in the s.

With an improvement in the overall security situation, the number of tourists visiting the state is gradually increasing, though those numbers may decrease after the recent deliberate targeting of tourists by militants in The conflict has also exacted a heavy toll on the state's infrastructure. Over 1, government buildings, educational buildings, eleven hospitals, bridges, and more than ten thousand privates houses and shops have been destroyed in violent incidents since the conflict began.

The state's inability to generate sufficient resources has led to an increased dependency on central assistance and borrowings. In an effort to generate employment opportunities and prevent the youth from joining the militancy, the central government has announced several aid packages over the years. The central government spends eight to ten times more on each citizen in Jammu and Kashmir than any other Indian state.

Jammu and Kashmir was the name of the territory that now includes territory under Pakistani and Chinese control. The remaining two-thirds is called Jammu and Kashmir by New Delhi and includes the Hindu and Buddhist majority regions. The conflict in Kashmir has its origins in the state's accession to India in As colonial rule came to an end in South Asia, the British decided to create two separate countries, India and Pakistan. The smaller kingdoms that were part of the British "Raj," having accepted the suzerainty of Britain, were offered the choice of resuming their independent status or joining with either Hindu-majority India or Muslim-majority Pakistan.

Most chose to accede based on geography or religious majority. However, Kashmir was a problem because it was a border Muslim-majority state ruled by a Hindu king. The British left its fate for future negotiations because the Maharaja of Kashmir had failed to decide whether to accede to either India or Pakistan. Kashmir immediately became the subject of conflict between the two new countries. Pakistan believed that the division of territories generally between the two countries had been influenced by Lord Mountbatten, the last colonial viceroy, who got on well with Indian leader Jawaharlal Nehru but had no great personal affection for Pakistan's leader, Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

Unable to defend his kingdom, the Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, sought India's assistance, and on October 26, , signed an Instrument of Accession, [10] paving the way for Indian soldiers to come to his aid. The war ended in January with Indian and Pakistani military representatives defining a ceasefire line, freezing the positions held by the two armies.

The contour of this line has changed slightly after later wars, but has remained more or less the de facto border between Pakistan and India in Kashmir and is called the Line of Control. The total area of Jammu and Kashmir is , sq. In January India filed a complaint against Pakistan with the U. Security Council under the dispute mechanism of the United Nations Charter. In a series of resolutions in , the Security Council called for a ceasefire; asked Pakistan to withdraw all forces, regular or irregular; and, in a third part that was not binding unless the first two had been implemented, said that the future status of the entire Kashmir state would be determined "through a free and impartial plebiscite.

India has never held the plebiscite described in Security Council Resolution Nor has Pakistan withdrawn its troops from Kashmir as envisaged by this and the other resolutions of To defend its failure to hold a plebiscite, India points to Pakistan's failure to withdraw troops from the area under its control and also cites the vote of the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, elected in in polls held by India that, despite an overwhelming Muslim representation, voted in favor of confirming accession to India.

India's argument for the legitimacy of its claim to all of Jammu and Kashmir, including the portion administered by Pakistan, is based on the Instrument of Accession signed with Maharaja Hari Singh. Pakistan believes that Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir will choose to be part of Pakistan and it will justify, once again, the ideological basis for the partition. India and Pakistan fought another war over Jammu and Kashmir in Once again, infiltrators from Pakistan entered Jammu and Kashmir state, backed by the Pakistan army in what was called Operation Gibraltar.

Initially, Indian troops were deployed only in Kashmir, but in September Indian forces opened another front in Punjab, advancing towards Lahore. The United States and United Kingdom, the primary suppliers of arms to the two countries, reacted by suspending military aid. In , a third war between the two countries led to the secession of East Pakistan and its independence as Bangladesh. This truncation of Pakistan further exacerbated the distrust between Pakistan and India.

After the war, India and Pakistan signed a pact on July 2, , commonly known as the Simla Agreement, which defined the Line of Control in Kashmir and committed both sides to future bilateral negotiations on all outstanding issues, including Kashmir. But recently, President Musharraf and some militant groups have said that they are willing to give up the demand for self-determination if India agrees to be flexible on demands for demilitarization and self-governance in Kashmir.

The neighbors came to the brink of war several times after the Simla treaty: in when India conducted Operation Brasstacks, massive military maneuvers near the Pakistani border; in , when India first discovered the extent to which the Kashmir rebellion was being assisted by Pakistan and threatened retaliation; in , when Pakistan seized territory in Jammu and Kashmir's Kargil sector; and once again in , when both countries deployed troops at the border after the Indian parliament was attacked on December 13, , allegedly by Pakistani militants the last two episodes are described in more detail below.

But the heavy deployment of troops and the exchange of fire each time led to civilian deaths, injuries and displacement. Jammu and Kashmir is the only state in India with its own constitution. However, this autonomy never materialized. Through the s and s, there was increasing political discontent with the central government's attempts to manipulate politics in Jammu and Kashmir.

Political leaders who demanded genuine autonomy and pro-plebiscite activists were repeatedly jailed. In , in a move that largely discredited him with pro-independence Kashmiris, Sheikh Abdullah, who had originally led popular dissent against Maharaja Hari Singh and later against political control by Delhi, signed an accord with Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi that promised greater autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir.

After Sheikh Abdullah's death in , his son Dr. Farooq Abdullah took over as chief minister. Paper Back. Condition: New. Very good condition. Seller Inventory More information about this seller Contact this seller. Any book may show light shelf wear from warehouse storage and handling. Seller Inventory SKU Ships with Tracking Number! Buy with confidence, excellent customer service!.

Seller Inventory n. Donna Wells; Bruce C. Donna Wells ; Bruce C. Publisher: HCI Teens , This specific ISBN edition is currently not available. View all copies of this ISBN edition:. Synopsis About this title Since September 11, life in America has been turned upside down. This is a must-have for every teen concerned about safety, courage and community spirit.

About the Author : Donna K. Too bad your parents decided it was-survey says: "Just too risky. To put it simply, you're PO'd. So, when being ticked wears off, you're just confused. What is happening to life as we knew it? Is all the fun soon going to be gone? How Much do You Know? Since the bombing raids in Afghanistan, air travel in this country has incurred: a. Travel, for reasons other than vacation, is: a. Since , travel fares across the country are: a. Increased caution and security is important when traveling by: a.

Travel in our country will: a. F- Buy New Learn more about this copy. Customers who bought this item also bought. Stock Image. New Paper Back Quantity Available: 2. Seller Rating:. Published by HCI Teens.